|
|
| |
| Plans for the second 5 year term | |
|
| |
[I] Generation of mouse mutants |
|
| |
|
|
| |
With the support of the CDB and NBR (National
Bioresource Project), we are collaborating with researchers within
the CDB and around Japan in developing mutant mice for research in
the fields of developmental biology and regenerative science. As part
of this collaboration, we have a responsibility for making mutant mice,
while partner researchers for identifying genes of interest and analyzing
mutant phenotype. We ask that ownership of the generated mutant mice
remain with the CDB so that they can be freely distributed to researchers
around the world upon request, while maintaining the condition that
partner researchers can use the mice freely at any time for their own
research, including collaborative work done with a third party. In
principle, after two years have passed since the first publication
using the specific mutant mice, we will then freely distribute the
mice. Until that period has been reached, any mice generated are distributed
to a third party only with the concurrence of our partner researchers.
Please refer our homepage (http://www.cdb.riken.go.jp/arg/) for further
details of the contract for use with our partner researchers.
We usually deliver germline chimera at weaning to our
partner researchers within 8 months of receiving cDNA sequence
information from them, or within four months of receiving the
targeting vector. Mice born after DNA injection into zygotes
are delivered to our partner researchers at weaning within three
months of receiving transgene DNA from them. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
(1) Mutant mice production with ES cells. |
|
| |
In generating mutant mice by homologous recombination
in ES cells, we will work by (i) generating targeting vectors with
the sequence information provided by researchers, (ii) isolating homologous
recombinants with targeting vectors made by researchers, or (iii) by
producing chimera with homologous recombinants isolated by researchers.
Option (iii) is only available to CDB researchers, and it is currently
our operating principle to perform ES injection into embryos only when
the cells are diploid after making karyotype examination in our hands.
For option (ii), we will accept isolation only in cases where the vector
is constructed under our supervision.
In our system one technical assistant constructs one targeting vector every
two weeks. We now have two technical assistants and can make up to 40 vectors
a year. We began the vector construction for collaborative mutant production
on October 1, 2003 (Record 1). The targeting vector
is constructed by isolating genomic sequences with long PCR where the gene
is disrupted; it is constructed by BAC-based recombination where the gene
is replaced with another gene or is conditionally mutated (Please refer
to our homepage (http://www.cdb.riken.go.jp/arg/) for further details of
vector construction). We currently have two technical assistants working
on isolating homologous recombinant ES cells. One assistant can routinely
isolate the ES recombinants at the rate of one vector per week, meaning
we can isolate the recombinants at a rate of around 80-100 vectors a year
(Record 2).
Zygotes are routinely frozen and these frozen zygotes are used as a source
for host embryos for ES injection. One line of ES cells is routinely injected
into 80 embryos at one time; four cell lines are injected each day, and
injections are made on three days every week. It is therefore possible
to inject 12 ES cell lines into about 1,000 embryos every week, with the
embryos being transferred into about 50 foster mothers. Our capacity of
injection is approximately 50 ES cell lines per month and 500 ES cell lines
per year (Record 3). In our experience of the past
three years, the injection has been made once in about half of the ES clones;
germline chimeric mice are obtained on average in 5-10% of the embryos
transferred to foster mothers. The injection has to be repeated, however,
in around half of the ES clones to get germline chimeric mice. We have
also produced chimeric mice with mutant ES cells isolated by CDB researchers.
Generally, however, very few germline chimeric mice have been obtained
with these ES cells. In January 2004 we introduced karyotype analysis for
all ES clones, with only diploid clones being injected into host embryos
to make germline chimeric mice |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Record (1): Construction of targeting vectors |
Partner researchers |
Inside CDB |
Outside CDB |
Total |
2002 |
5 |
0 |
5 |
2003 |
9 |
18 |
27 |
2004 |
8 |
22 |
30 |
| 2005 |
13 |
19 |
32 |
| 2006 |
17 |
28 |
45 |
| 2007 |
23 |
44 |
67 |
| 2008* |
18 |
48 |
66 |
|
|
| *2008.1.1~9.30 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Record (2): Isolation of homologous recombinant ES cells
(number of targeting vectors subjected to isolation) |
| Partner researchers |
Inside CDB |
Outside CDB |
Total |
| 2001 |
4 |
0 |
4 |
| 2002 |
12 |
0 |
12 |
| 2003 |
34 |
14 |
48 |
| 2004 |
32 |
56 |
88 |
| 2005 |
36 |
54 |
90 |
| 2006 |
52 |
68 |
120 |
| 2007 |
32 |
103 |
135 |
| 2008* |
17 |
85 |
102 |
| |
|
| *2008.1.1~9.30 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Record (3): Production of germline chimera with homologous
recombinant ES cells isolated in our laboratory:
No. of ES clones subjected
to chimera production |
| Partner researchers |
Inside CDB |
Outside CDB |
Total |
| 2001 |
20(38) |
0 |
20(38) |
| 2002 |
74 (186) |
0 |
74(186) |
| 2003 |
144(253) |
0 |
176(305) |
| 2004 |
77(148) |
140(277) |
217(425) |
| 2005 |
91(123) |
106(154) |
197(277) |
| 2006 |
68(76) |
112(139) |
180(215) |
| 2007 |
112(113) |
165(186) |
277(299) |
| 2008* |
26(45) |
117(162) |
143(207) |
| |
|
| *2008.1.1~9.30 |
|
| Parentheses indicate the number of injections; each injection
is made with 80 embryos |
|
|
| |
BACK TO TOP |
|
| |
(2) Transgenesis by DNA injection into zygotes. |
|
| |
The production of transgenic mice by microinjection
of cloned DNA into zygotes is a service provided for CDB members;
this is done as collaborative projects for researchers outside CDB.
We routinely inject one transgene into 250 zygotes which are fostered
into 12 pseudopregnant females. We use frozen zygotes and administer
the injections four days a week. We can therefore inject 4 constructs
per week, 15-20 constructs per month and 150-200 constructs per year.
We are currently able to carry out injection within two weeks of
receiving a transgene DNA. We only accept, however, collaborative
work requests for enhancer analysis from CDB members and researchers
that belong to institutes with which the CDB has an official agreement
on scientific exchange. The frequency of transgenesis is around 3%
of zygotes injected in enhancer analysis (Record
4). For this analysis we instruct the
careful preparation of the DNA solution to CDB members. In contrast
to this, in the production of transgenic mouse with DNA solution
from a variety of researchers, the efficiency is fairly low (Record
5). We also produce BAC transgenic mice (Record
6). |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Record (4): Generation of transgenic embryos for enhancer
analysis |
| |
No of Genes |
No of constructs |
No of embryos injected |
No of embryos transgenic (%) |
| 2002 |
10 |
52 |
11,376 |
414(3.6%) |
| 2003 |
14 |
73 |
17,923 |
680(3.8%) |
| 2004 |
9 |
87 |
26,877 |
757(2.8%) |
| 2005 |
5 |
115 |
45,650 |
1105(2.4%) |
| 2006 |
8 |
161 |
51,058 |
1693(3.3%) |
| 2007 |
3 |
100 |
36,704 |
1713(4.7%) |
| 2008* |
3 |
26 |
8,289 |
150(1.8%) |
| *2008.1.1~9.30 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Record (5): Transgenic mouse production with cloned DNAs |
| |
No of constructs |
No of embryos injected |
No of embryos
transgenic (%)
|
| 2002 |
42 |
14,127 |
105 (0.7%) |
| 2003 |
81 |
30,919 |
325 (1.1%) |
| 2004 |
89 |
41,989 |
480(1.1%) |
| 2005 |
59 |
37,935 |
465(1.2%) |
| 2006 |
57 |
29,182 |
378(1.3%) |
| 2007 |
48 |
24,182 |
325(1.3%) |
| 2008* |
29 |
12,168 |
123(1.0%) |
| *2008.1.1~9.30 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Record (6): Transgenic mouse production with BAC DNAs |
| |
No of constructs |
No of embryos injected |
No of transgenic pups obtained |
| 2002 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| 2003 |
9 |
4,323 |
44(1.0%) |
| 2004 |
14 |
5,776 |
74(1.3%) |
| 2005 |
5 |
3,809 |
10(0.3%) |
| 2006 |
7 |
4,264 |
29(0.7%) |
| 2007 |
8 |
3,818 |
39(1.0%) |
| 2008 |
7 |
1,618 |
30(1.9%) |
| *2008.1.1~9.30 |
|
|
| |
BACK TO TOP |
|
| |
[II] Development of new reproductive technologies in mammals |
|
| |
|
|
| |
(1) Cryopreservation of mouse strains |
|
| |
As an alternate, simple and/or more efficient
method of cryopreservation of mouse strains, we have been examining
the potential advantages of gamete freezing. Sperm is frozen by simply
dipping them into liquid nitrogen. Sperm frozen in this way from several
inbred strains (B6, BALB and CBA) are thawed by maintaining them in
room temperature for about 5min and directly injecting them into unfertilized
eggs of their respective strains. Fertilized eggs have been obtained
at a rate of 1/2-1/3 of those obtained using fresh sperm; the rates
are, however, strain- dependent, and is approximately 15%, even using
fresh sperm, in the B6 strain. This dependency is most probably found
in oocytes rather than in sperm, as the rate is fairly high at about
50% with both fresh and frozen B6 sperm when oocytes are BDF1. Current
research is focusing on attempts to increase the rate of fertilization
using B6 oocytes.
Ovaries are mildly minced and cryopreserved by vitrification. After thawing,
they are transplanted into recipient females, and the females are mated
naturally with males. We are currently investigating the mouse strain dependency
of the success rate. Developing cloning technology for preservation of
mouse strains is another issue. Earlobe and tail that are dissected upon
mice identification and genotyping are frozen. The frozen tissues are thawed
and cultured. Nuclei are isolated from the cultured cells and transplanted
into unfertilized eggs, so that the mouse strain is reconstructed from
frozen somatic tissues. The efficient isolation of nuclei of fibroblastic
cells from these tissues is critical, and work is currently in progress
to overcome this difficulty. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
(2) Mutant mice production by nuclear transfer with mutant ES nuclei. |
|
| |
With mutant ES cells, mutant mice are obtained
as F1 offspring of chimeric mice generated by the injection of cells
into host embryos and transplanting the embryos into a foster mother.
We have tested the possibility that nuclear transfer from mutant ES
cells into enucleated eggs facilitates production of mutant mice. The
success rate of nuclear transplantation in our process is approximately
3% of embryos transferred into the uterus of foster mothers with cumulus
cells and with wild type ES cells. Nuclear transplantation with mutant
ES cells was also performed at a similar success rate. The transplantation,
however, was unsuccessful with ES clones that did not give rise to
germ-line chimera (0/7). Moreover, only five among 21 ES clones that
colonized into germline were successfully nuclear-transplanted when
examined on 50 embryos that were transferred to foster mothers. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
(3) Development of mouse strains useful in mammalian genetics and embryology |
|
| |
From fiscal year 2005, we have started to develop
mouse strains by ourselves for wide use in mammalian genetics and embryology.
We accept suggestions by researchers within the CDB and around Japan.
The first mutants we are generating harbor a mutant loxP in Rosa locus
(RosaloxP). Upon DNA injection into zygotes, transgenes are integrated
randomly, with their expression dependent on the integrated sites.
With the use of the RosaloxP zygotes as a host upon DNA injection,
any transgenes will be integrated into the RosaloxP site efficiently
by Cre-mediated recombination. Rosa locus is ubiquitously active, and
the transgenes will be expressed ubiquitously. We are also developing
mouse mutants that harbor a mutant loxP in a transcriptionaly neutral
site to express transgenes spatio-tempo-specifically.
It is useful to be able to temporally trace the spatial relationship of
different cell populations with embryogenesis. In collaboration with Dr.
Hatta of Vertebrate Body Plan Group we have managed to generate mouse mutants
that express Kaede ubiquitously. The color of Kaede changes from green
to red by photo-conversion, thereby making it possible to trace the spatial
relationship of different cell populations with embryogenesis. |
|
| |
BACK TO TOP |
|
| |
[III] Animal housing and welfare |
|
| |
|
|
| |
This laboratory is also in charge of animal housing.
In the CDB animal facility 32 rooms are available for animal housing,
and four rooms for animal experiments. Each room is 25 meters square
and contains 8 cage racks holding 72 cages. Water is supplied automatically,
while cages are changed and cleaned, and food is supplied by our
staff; 19 employees of JAC (Japan Animal Care) are in charge of this
service. To minimize the chance of infectious diseases in housing
animals, usually one housing room is used by members of only one
project. At the end of March, 2004, two of the 32 rooms are shared
by groups of small-scale users for mice and rats, respectively. Twenty
eight rooms are used by each single project and two rooms are vacant.
The number of rooms in which the number of mouse cages used is more
than 90% of the maximum (576 cages) is three, twenty-five rooms are
used at 50-80% capacity, and the number of rooms with less than 50%
capacity is two. (Record7)
We are routinely freezing zygotes to stock mutant mouse strains by the
vitrification method. We also routinely perform in vitro fertilization
and transfer of fertilized eggs to foster mothers in order to expand mouse
colonies quickly to meet the requests of CDB researchers. After receiving
researchers' requests we are also able to routinely supply pregnant females,
foster mothers and frozen embryos. Moreover, we are responsible for the
exchange of mouse strains with institutes both inside and outside Japan.
(Record8-11)
For the welfare of experimental animals, we ask ourselves, as well
as CDB researchers to ensure: (1) the healthy housing of animals,
(2) minimization of animal pain and fear when used in experiments
and (3) restriction of animal experiments to only those which
are essential. In order to ensure this, a guideline for animal
experiments has been prepared by the CDB Animal Experiment
Committee, and we follow this guideline. The guideline is comparable
to “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” by ILAR
of the NIH. Researchers engaged in such experiments are well
educated in them as set forth in the guideline.
Infectious diseases are one of the most critical issues, not
only for the quality of animal experiments but also for animal
welfare. Please refer to our homepage (http://www.cdb.riken.go.jp/arg/policy_en.html)
for our policy and measures against infectious diseases. Propagation
of infection is frequently accelerated by researchers, and we do
not, therefore, allow researchers who are engaging in experiments
with rodents in other facilities to enter the CDB animal facility.
The exchange of animals with other facilities is another risk factor
for contamination. With the exception of animals from breeders,
we do not allow any live animals directly into the housing
rooms even if they are certified by a veterinarian of the sender's
institute; all animals are placed in the housing rooms only
after cleaning by in vitro fertilization. We therefore ask
senders to provide us with two to three males; moreover, the
in vitro fertilization process benefits CDB researchers by
the quick establishment of sufficient mouse colonies for experiments.
When we send mice housed in the CDB to other facilities, they
are accompanied by the health record of animals which have
been housed in the same room. We consider it is the responsibility
of the recipients, however, whether to agree to receive the
mice from us and as to how they acclimatize the mice to their
facility. We strongly recommend that they receive frozen embryos
from us or introduce our mice into their facilities by in vitro
fertilization; we are prepared to teach these techniques to
the employees of any non-CDB facilities. |
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Record (7): Animal housing (number of rooms and cages used) |
| 2001 |
10 rooms |
3,345 cages |
| 2002 |
19 rooms |
8,759 cages |
| 2003 |
28 rooms |
10,218 cages |
| 2004 |
31 rooms |
11,314 cages |
| 2005 |
31rooms |
11,507 cages |
| 2006 |
31rooms |
11,956 cages |
| 2007 |
31rooms |
11,291 cages |
| 2008* |
30rooms |
10,461 cages |
| |
|
|
| ( Maximum 32 rooms 70% of 18,432 cages = 12,902 cages ) |
| *2008.1.1~9.30 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Record (8): Freezing embryos |
| 2001 |
119 strains |
28,923 embryos |
| 2002 |
124 strains |
39,616 embryos |
| 2003 |
292 strains |
96,045 embryos |
| 2004 |
252 strains |
71,393 embryos |
| 2005 |
512 strains |
112,517 embryos |
| 2006 |
700 strains |
150,987 embryos |
| 2007 |
289 strains |
148,268 embryos |
| 2008* |
325 strains |
135,388 embryos |
| |
|
|
| *2008.1.1~9.30 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Record (9): Propagating mouse colonies by in vitro fertilization |
| 2001 |
55 strains |
5,671 mice |
| 2002 |
102 strains |
10,112 mice |
| 2003 |
99 strains |
9,689 mice |
| 2004 |
82 strains |
7,383 mice |
| 2005 |
120 strains |
8,867 mice |
| 2006 |
91 strains |
5,823 mice |
| 2007 |
91 strains |
5,596 mice |
| 2008* |
45 strains |
7,505 mice |
| |
|
|
| *2008.1.1~9.30 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Record (10): Introduction of mouse strains from outside of
CDB* |
| 2001 |
81 strains |
(0 from abroad) |
| 2002 |
67 strains |
(6 from abroad) |
| 2003 |
75 strains |
(10 from abroad) |
| 2004 |
70 strains |
(6 from abroad) |
| 2005 |
125 strains |
(25 from abroad) |
| 2006 |
120 strains |
(34 from abroad) |
| 2007 |
47 strains |
(18 from abroad) |
| 2008** |
99 strains |
(17 from abroad) |
| *all by in vitro fertilization |
| **2008.1.1~9.30 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| Record (11): Distributing mouse strains |
| 2001 |
0 |
|
| 2002 |
0 |
|
| 2003 |
3 strains |
(3 to abroad) |
| 2004 |
53 strains |
(7 to abroad) |
| 2005 |
99 strains |
(10 to abroad) |
| 2006 |
146 strains |
(16 to abroad) |
| 2007 |
101 strains |
(30 to abroad) |
| 2008* |
264 strains |
(31 to abroad) |
| |
|
|
| *2008.1.1~9.30 |
|
|
| |
BACK TO TOP |
|
| |
| Plans for the second 5 year term | |
|
| |
|
|
|